Hi all,
Take a look at this piece that appeared today in Mumbai Mirror. It talks about how a new bride should behave in her new home and adjust with her in-laws. There's not a single word or sentence about what the husband and in-laws can/should do to make the new member feel at home. If you thought Ekta Kapoor and k-serials were regressive, take a look at this sample of an article with advice by one Uttam Dave. While I have nothing against adjusting with husband and in-laws, it's the one-sidedness that bothers me. And the blatant encouragement to girls to turn into self-sacrificing deities once they are married.
Please write to the editor at mirrorfeedback@indiatimes.com telling them what you thought of the piece. And pls do past a copy of your sent letter in the Comments section. Below are some of the "tips" from this precious article.
The Article -- Excerpts reproduced (my light-hearted comments in red ink)
In the Indian context, the onus for overall adjustment in life always lies largely with the woman. This is the reason why most of the counselling at the pre-marital stage is targeted at women. Unfortunately, most Indian men still do not gear up and take the required initiative in this area. Some do it willingly after their emotional needs are met by the wife.
The advice:
Let the husband spend time with his family members and don’t be over possessive. Love for your partner can often breed jealousy and malice towards your in-laws, especially if he’s close to his mother. Make it a point to overlook small lapses made by the in-laws and try to understand them as human beings.
(Sigh, your husband is a typical Indian patidev who forgot his spine with his brains behind his mother's petticoat. His mother will control him shamelessly and instead of airing your protest and requesting your rights as his wife, it's better if you just plain shut up.)
Every household has its own distinct culture and adapting to it and enriching it should be the sole aim. Making constant comparisons with your biological family is another folly.
(Ladki is paraya dhan. They don't just say that. Forget your parents, your background, and your identity. No room for your thoughts to be respected or incorporated here, just be a docile doormat, and well, watch saas-bahu serials for inspiration on being the ideal bahu/bhabhi).
Be eager to learn from your mother-in-law’s experience about everything – management, babysitting and cooking.
(Yes, she can't stop putting you down to calm her own damn insecurities, but grin and bear it. Even compliment her and stroke her ego. Let the humble doormat be your inspiration, even heard it complain?)
Avoid competition with your sister-in-law, mother-in-law or any other member of your age. Being in a family essentially means co-operation and a genuine effort to feel happy in others’ happiness.
(Yesyes, but never expect these nice, thoughtful gestures from the in-laws. Tsk tsk, this advice is only for you, my girl. Pray that you get a son and you can also be the domineering mother-in-law someday!)
Small gestures like serving tea smilingly in the morning, remembering your father-in-law’s medicine-taking timings go a long way towards fulfilling their emotional needs and endearing you to them.
(What's that? What about your emotional needs? Oh, please scroll upwards for the doormat example. Any more questions? I didn't think so! )
Try to control your anger and temper tantrums even if you feel the need to complain to your husband.
(No, who told you that you could be a regular human being with normal feelings? And that it's your husband's responsibility to look after you, just like you look after him? Why you want to bother the poor, tired soul with your problems? Just bottle them up inside you and take it out on your daughter-in-law when your time comes. So simple!)
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
Is it not wonderful that even in the 21st century , these 13th century "ideals" exist. And the funny thing is that all this advice is so demeaning to men and their families also. Men and their families come across as domineering, insecure, insensitive... even as the babying of them is left to women.
A patriarchal set up is as bad for men as it is for women.When will they learn.
This newspaper should be sued for this "advice"
this is a wonderful website that i noticed only a few days back. i have wriiten to the mumbai mirror and below is the letter copy. hope others write too.
-------------------------------
Dear Editor,
I was shocked to read the article Knot Adjustable as it very chauvinistic and discriminative. It is indeed sad that the article focuses only on that adjustments that a girl must make. That's a highly chauvinistic and outdated thought process. Instead of encouraging such one-sided advice, a responsible paper like Mumbai Mirror should have given both sides. There should also have been a section devoted to what the husband should do to make the new bride, who has left her own home to come and live with him, comfortable in the new house. How can the adjustment be only from one side?
It's shocking that MM carried such a biased story in the paper. It reminded me of a certain sect that sends only its daughters to `classes' before marriage where they are taught to be obedient to their husbands and in-laws and be tolerant towards everyday hostility. Your article in the paper is doing the same thing!
The above points in the article encourage a young bride to be a self-sacrificing,undemanding doormat. Shame on you, Mumbai Mirror.
Regards
PREETA SURESH
some reactions to the article on the mumbai mirror website
-----------------------------------
Mumbai Mirror seems to forget thvt this paper doesnt cater to men alone..This is a typical male chauvinistic attitude.Why do women do all the sacrifices, work in a office, look after kids, in laws etc & still be treated like a door mat. Indeed despicable that such a article could be passed on for printing by the editor..Shame on you MM
- Contributed by Sweta , swetasm@yahoo.com on Sunday, June 22, 200809:43 PM
----------------------------------------
Dear Mr. Dave
This instantly reminded me of a movie in which the 'leading-lady' saying "Jo Aaj tak meri pasand kisi insaan-father, mother or brothers ne nahin poochi, aur ek bhoot(ghostly figure) bolta hai...
Moral: we need more bhoots not humans...
Mera Bharat Mahaan (_____)
To fill in the blanks, type tha-in-hindi...
anja nmahiniranjan
- Contributed by anjnmahinirnjn , aeripun@yahoo.com on Sunday, June 22, 200806:19 PM
----------------------------------
How chauvinistic this advice is, putting the entire onus of the relationship on the female. No wonder we are such a gender unequal society.
And doesn't the author even see how insecure, insensitive and domineering she paints the guy and his family. This article is chauvinistic and atavistic, out of place in a leading newspaper. As a woman I am appalled another woman could write bull crap of this nature denigrating our gender. Patriarchy is not to be pandered to.
- Contributed by Alankrita , alanacmd@yahoo.com on Sunday, June 22, 200809:10 AM
-----------------------------------
Dear Editor,
I was shocked to read the article Knot Adjustable as it very chauvinistic and discriminative. It is indeed sad that the article focuses only on that adjustments that a girl must make. That's a highly chauvinistic and outdated thought process. Instead of encouraging such one-sided advice, a responsible paper like Mumbai Mirror should have given both sides. There should also have been a section devoted to what the husband should do to make the new bride, who has left her own home to come and live with him, comfortable in the new house. How can the adjustment be only from one side?
It's shocking that MM carried such a biased story in the paper. It reminded me of a certain sect that sends only its daughters to `classes' before marriage where they are taught to be obedient to their husbands and in-laws and be tolerant towards everyday hostility. Your article in the paper is doing the same thing!
The above points in the article encourage a young bride to be a self-sacrificing,undemanding doormat. Shame on you, Mumbai Mirror.
Regards,
Preeta Suresh
- Contributed by preeta , preetsur@rediffmail.com on Sunday, June 22, 200812:24 AM
-----------------------------------
hi it's me again :-)
please see this link. another blog has written about this article.
also check out the mumbai mirror page of this article. there are so many angry responses!! gr8!
(http://chandni.wordpress.com/2008/06/23/
kahaani-ghar-ghar-ki-or-insert-a-k-serial
/#comment-10979)
fantastic frisking.
I've done it too on my blog but preeta has posted the link already. Its not a subtle as yours :)
i really liked this blog..
especially when you addressed the husband in the indian style of patidev... hehe and the humble doormat appeal.. oh yeah definitly..
not that you cant get inspiration from any of the soaps right now..
and i think the best thing to do is to get a punching bag to keep the temper in control.. because am sure one would like to be punch after all this..
OMG! Heights! Bad enough to hear such "advice" ...to see it printed on a newspaper!!!
the tea will get cold someday and the smile will disappear. doctors, architects, designers, teachers - even without a job women should not be asked to do things that make her look like she's begging for acceptance. A family is supposed to take care of the bride. Infact this list should've been for a husband who will introduce a new member of the family to everyone and make sure she fits in well. Treating a woman like a human begins by respecting her as an individual and not some herd that gets married to a family that expects everything. We need articles that tell families how to accept a bride and make her feel at home. And a long long list for the husband too. Please start writing this one, even if its endless.
My SIL followed all those advise. Now I see how shrewd of her. Cause in a few years the in-laws moved to their native place. She got her independence. With age MIL & FIL have tempered down. Now the SIL is the boss.
And to @lankr1ta , inside the house most men in such families are babies. They leave a mess of their clothes. Never keep their thngs in order, rather make more mess. Never pick up any stuff. Grandson is also taught to behave the same. Ladies are supposed to pick & keep house neat. Food should be serve right wherever they are; no coming to dining area. The list is endless.
I know, poonam, the men who grow up in homes where this is what is expected of their wives, never become adults ever.
In my opinion the advice given to women should be
a. never marry a guy who would expect you to undergo such change for him
b. never marry into a family which has such "great expectations" from you
c. never marry someone who does not respect you for who you are...
I never see that advice being given. It is always about adjusting, always that dirty word called compromise. I wonder how anyone in their right mind can call it a "relationship" when it is a laundry list of what the female is supposed to do. Its a dictatorship.
here's mine. http://thebratthebeanandbedlam.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/the-doormats-guide-to-a-lasting-marriage/
Sad. I can't picture my brother's wife wondering if she is treading on my fragile ego if she shares her pride and delight in her achievements with me.
Where are the lessons in sharing and caring? Mutual respect and civility is not mentioned either...this guy needs serious counseling.
I have always felt, and repeat again, that Indian girls should ask themselves if they are not better off unmarried then be stuck in such stifling situations?
They should refuse to marry into any family that even hints at such expectations.
Also, this is not only bad for the girl, it's terrible for the in-laws too. Any Indian woman with a son or brother will be an SIL or a future MIL. DO we want to participate in this ridiculous suppression of another human?
I wrote this to Mumbai Mirror, and as requested by you posting a copy here.
Look at the Bigger Picture. This articles shows us -
1.) Why nobody wants daughters in this country. Son brings the power to rule over a girl from another family. Daughter will cause heartache, knowing she is expected to live like this. Not to mention the dowry you have to arrange to give her THIS future. [Why not get her a good education and freedom instead??]
2.) What happens to those enlightened families that did not use female foeticide to procure a male child? Shouldn’t their daughters be ‘allowed’ to take care of their parents? If we follow Dave’s formula no Indian parents will want daughters.
2.) Why crimes against women are on increase. Men in such a scenario grow up believing that any woman who does not fall in this mould must be ‘asking for it’.
3.) Think of these men’s trauma when they meet successful female colleagues who do not pander to their egos? No mamma/Uttam Dave’s counselling to protect them in office? And female bosses!? Unlike their pativrata wives, their colleagues don't think they have a 'Divine Right to have all women tread cautiously on their fragile male egos’.
4.) Men also need to be brought up to be responsible adults not like immature fools. Such a system does exactly the opposite. If they can treat women with respect in their office, and at school as kids, then they can be made to learn to play fair at home with their life-partners also.
5.) This article makes an average joint family members appear so villainous, the article might scare away any genuine affection a girl does have for her in laws.
6.) The Ekta Kapoor kind of autocratic patriarch ruled joint family system that Dave projects seems to rest on a sort of compromise that accepts injustice, inequality and IN-LAW dominance as its premise. Unless this changes, no bridal-counselling can save the Great Indian Joint Family System.
I wrote this
http://virtualityforreal.blogspot.com/2008/07/vintage-sexism-in-new-avatar.html
linked u- did my take
http://itchingtowriteblogs.blogspot.com/2008/07/missing-counsel.html
I think it is important to note the following. The US has a divorce rate about 40 times the rate in India. The UK has a bit lower, but still nearly 40 times.
It is a strength of India that our families are strong, and strong families are one reason why Indian-Americans do so well in the US. I fully sympathize with the wishes of wives to be treated well and I think female foeticide is a disgrace. Husbands and wives should treat each other with love and respect. At the same time, it is very very important that we do not allow western ideals, coming to India via our English educated community, to undermine our families. I do not have an easy solution to offer, but I just want to offer a caution. Sometimes "progressive" is good, and sometimes it is a sugar coated poison pill. In each case we need to think, "Is this good?" Women who want careers and freedom have a right to have them. But other women want to be at home with their children. We should not set up a system which undermines the family.
Post a Comment